In what case did the driver correctly comply with the requirements of this sign?

Explanation

He gave way to all vehicles moving on the crossing road.

The sign in the picture is the inverted triangle with a red border: "give way". This sign's requirement is absolute and admits of no exception as to the type of vehicle; that is, on reaching the junction you must give way to anything moving on the crossing road, not only to motor vehicles.

The difference between the two options is a single word: "vehicle" is a broader concept than "motor vehicle" and takes in bicycles, mopeds and horse-drawn carts. If you read the text of the law as "motor", you reach the wrong conclusion that you may pull out in front of a cyclist.

The safety reason lies exactly there: the most vulnerable road user at a junction is precisely the cyclist. He has no bodywork and no airbag, no engine noise to draw your attention, and appears small and faint in the mirror. An inexperienced driver's eye searches for a "car" and does not process a bicycle; most junction collisions with cyclists are of this kind.

Another practical point: "give way" is not the same as "stop". This sign does not compel you to come to a complete halt; if the crossing road is clear you may proceed without stopping. The real requirement is that nobody on the crossing road should be forced to change speed or direction.

• The word "motor" narrows the scope and that is what makes it tempting; you are obliged to give way to bicycles, mopeds and horse-drawn carts moving on the crossing road as well.

Sources and content coverage · Report a content error